Biblically Balanced Ministries equipping Christians, families, and churches to live and minister Biblically balanced
balancedministries.org
 

Enter a search phrase:
 
A Current Commentary From Biblically Balanced Ministries, Inc.

A New Definition of “CEO” (September 2002)

Recently while leading a pastors’ open forum on “Transitions in Ministry,” the subject of leadership style became a topic. The “CEO” model became a significant part of the discussion. A value of the CEO model is that it faces the reality of the need for someone to lead. However, the dangers of the CEO model may overrule the value. Finding a balance in the role of leadership is essential to preserving the biblical model of leadership.

The common definition of the CEO is “Chief Executive Officer.” Translated into practice it often reflects an autocratic and hierarchical pattern of leadership. A reality is that this type of leadership is often the most effective in getting things accomplished. Often churches demonstrating high growth have pastors who follow the CEO model.

Effective ministry requires leadership. Biblical examples of leadership are presented throughout the Old and New Testament. Characteristics of the CEO model are reflected in numerous examples but are balanced with other characteristics.

OVERCOMING THE DANGERS OF THE CEO MODEL

A consideration of what should be the model for leadership will begin by looking at the dangers to overcome in the common CEO image. The first danger is self-centeredness. Leadership models in Scripture reveal a servant attitude not self-interest. Biblical leaders are not driven by personal gain or interest. The biblical leader is interested in God’s interest not his own.

Secondly, there is the danger of a dictatorship style or being self-confident. In such cases one becomes “the leader,” rather than seeking the input or participation of others in leadership. Moses was beginning to become this style leader when his father-in-law Jethro showed him a better way.

A third danger is the abuse of power. The abuse of power is often related to cult groups, but this is all too often seen in churches. When one individual has too much power the end result is often abuse. The common CEO model can lead to the abuse of power.

A BIBLICAL MODEL OF CEO

The church today needs to recognize and accept the role of the pastor as the leader. Many churches are so afraid of the dangers listed above, that they refuse to allow for biblical leadership. The CEO concept has validity but must be balanced by biblical character. A biblical definition of CEO could be “Coaching & Empowering Others.”

THE CHIEF AS COACH

Do we need a leader? This should not be the question. Throughout Scripture God reveals that when there is a task to be done, God raised up a leader. (Note: a leader, not a committee or board.) The question for the church is not who is to lead. God has clearly defined the leader as the pastor. The question that needs to be addressed is, “What is the model for leaders and pastors?” A suggestion is to define the role of the “chief” as “coach.”

Coaches like chiefs must be able to give direction and have a vision to lead. They also must be given the authority and respect to be able to lead. The coaching model emphasizes the recognition of the gifts and abilities of others and sees them as vital in the fulfilling of biblical purposes.

Jesus Christ Himself demonstrated the coaching model both in His relationship to His Father and with His disciples. Two of the keys to the ministry of Jesus were gentleness and humility (Matt. 11:25-30).

Characteristics of Coaching

Reassured by a clear call to ministry. Moses, Joshua, Jesus, and the disciples all had a definite sense of calling. Ministry will include discouragements and disappointments. Not all coaches know the thrill of victory but almost all know the agony of defeat. The call of God is essential to the pastor or leader in ministry to persevere in such times.
Relational in developing team ministry. The coach recognizes that he can do nothing without the team. Leadership that is relational becomes participatory not autocratic.
Resourceful in methodology. We are living in changing times. The coaching style ministry seeks to “understand the times, to know what to do.”
Revitalized in spirit. The spiritual coach must be spiritually “renewed day by day.” He is willing to rethink his priorities seeking balance in every area of his life and ministry.

THE COACH EMPOWERS

Call it empowering or call it delegating, a coach entrusts others with responsibility and authority. The controlling or self-centered leader is unlikely to share his power or position.

Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, taught him this valuable lesson on leadership. He was making the mistake of many leaders, trying to do it all himself. Moses demonstrated his willingness to listen to counsel not just give counsel. The coaching model of leadership is both willing to be taught and to teach. He established his position as making the major administrative decisions and delegating most other decisions to others.

The apostles followed this model in appointing deacons in Acts 6. The results were not simply getting a job done but also restoring unity in the church. Generally when the leader feels responsible to do all of the ministry it results in neglected areas of ministry. Reality is no one person can do all of the ministry. Further, God never designed the church to function that way.

Marks of Effective Empowering

Discerning the who and where of ministry. Recognizing the giftedness and abilities of people is essential to coaching. A good coach knows his players and their abilities. He knows how to position people according to their value to the team. The empowering process begins with discerning who is fitted for the team and where they fit. A special note: Leaders should be granted the freedom to carefully discern who fits on the team.
Defining the roles and responsibilities of the team is an essential part of coaching. Flexibility in leadership is vital. When delegating authority it is crucial to define roles, relationships, and accountability. Delegation without accountability can result in disorder. Defining roles must avoid the temptation of micromanagement.
Discipling is vital to the empowering process. A biblical qualification for leadership is they “must be apt to teach.” Effective leadership requires effective communication skills. The coach must teach the team members what is expected of them and clearly define the vision and plan. Paul’s relationship to Timothy exemplifies the teaching coach (2 Timothy 2:2).

Empowering is not for the weak of heart. The task of delegating to others requires faith in the people you empower and in your own call from God.

OTHERS ARE THE KEY

Think of those in the Bible who were empowered by people like Moses, Paul, and Barnabas. Joshua, Timothy, and John Mark all became effective leaders. Before they became leaders they served as team members with great leaders. The relationship that developed between these coaches and the “others” on the team increased the effectiveness of the whole team. Each of these coaches expressed appreciation for the work of his team members. Coaches know the value of “others” on the team.

The selection of the others on the team is one of the most crucial decisions of leadership. Others will either make or break a ministry team. Most pastors have experienced the destructiveness of a divisive staff or board member. The opposite should also be true. Pastors and leaders need to recognize that the effectiveness of their ministry is never solely because of themselves.

What should you look for in selecting “others” for your team?

Teachableness is an indispensable quality for both the coach and others on the team. Paul instructed Timothy how to develop his team. “The things you have heard from me among many witnesses, commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also” (2 Timothy 2:2). Underlying the instruction is the need for those we choose for team membership to be teachable. Likewise leaders must be both apt to teach and willing to be taught.
Faithfulness is the second quality essential for team membership. One definition of this term is “full of faith.” Ministry teams must begin with faith based ministry. The Bible is clear, “without faith it is impossible to please God.” Faithfulness also means that each team member is dependable to the other members.
Giftedness is the third quality essential for team ministry. God has gifted all believers with special enabling to be used in ministry. The ministry team needs to reflect the diversity of gifts to provide a balance to meet the complexity of ministry needs. A team is unlikely to have all the gifts. However, the team members should have gifts that supplement one another rather than duplicate the gifts of the senior leader.

Chiefs are still essential to the functioning of a team. The difference is in how you lead not if you lead. Coaching requires a chief who understands the value of each team member.

Leadership that is biblical knows the importance of having a leader (chief). The difference is in the objectives and style. “Coaching and Empowering Others” follows the priority established in Ephesians 4:12; “God gave some as . . . pastor –teachers for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry.”


The complete series of articles is being entitled: The Biblically Balanced CEO Builds a Team
I. Team Unity
II. A New Definition of CEO
III. Changing the Focus
IV. The Coach’s Coach


by Gary R. Becker, President

 
 © Copyright 2001-03 Biblically Balanced Ministries. All Rights Reserved.